Korean maternity

Yesterday my family and I went to Yonsei Severance Hospital in Seoul to visit a colleague who gave birth to a healthy baby boy.  Their older son is about the same age as our son, and they are very good friends.  Their first son wasn’t at the hospital when we visited, which was probably good because we would have spent most of our time watching over those two.  They tend to get pretty rambunctious when they play together, which isn’t a good thing in the middle of a maternity ward! 
 
Our visit to a maternity ward at a Korean hospital is an eye-opening experience.  The hospital is gorgeous, completely remodeled and very modern.  Many standard practices in Korean maternity ward appear to be far different than those found in a typical American hospital.  Many Korean practices are reminiscent of what one experienced in the U.S. in the 1960’s and 1970’s.  I’m not implying that Korea is behind the times–Korean hospitals have developed their own set of practices that they believe are best for both mother and child.  It’s debatable whether Korean or American practices are preferrable, but it is true that they are different.  For one, in Korea, newborn infants are immediately separated from their mothers and taken to centralized nurseries.  Mothers check into their own rooms and visit their infants frequently for nursings.  Fathers and other visitors must stand outside the nursery and visit the newborn child through a large visitation window.  I was told that this is to prevent infection in the child.  In addition, Korean fathers are typically not allowed into the birthing room to witness the birth of their child, although expatriate fathers can be in the birthing room during natural births.  Fathers are not allowed in the operating room when the mother undergoes a C-section.  Mother and child (or children) typically stay in the hospital for up to three days and are then transferred to a center where they spent up to three weeks together recuperating from the birth.  Korean mothers and their infants often do not return home until three or four weeks after the child’s birth–family members come to visit them.  This is based on the common Asian assumption that mothers and newborn infants need to remain stationary for one month in order to recuperate from birth trauma.  In addition, because circumcision is not a common practice in Korea, many hospitals do not perform them.
 
Knowing this, I am glad that we will not give birth to our second child in Korea.  As a father, I much prefer being with my wife and child during the birth and acting as midwife.  I like being together in the same room and sharing the immediate joy of parenthood with both my wife and child, rather than being a spectator who’s wondering what’s happening behind Chinese walls.  Being in the same room with our son put less strain on my wife when she needed to take care of his needs.  We also checked out of the hospital after two days and returned home with our child.  I appreciate the need to provide a clean environment for a newborn child and giving both mother and child enough time to recover from the birth, but I still prefer the intimacy and flexibility of the American system.  Of course I would–I’m American.  That said, I’m impressed with the professionalism and level of skill of the Korean hospital staff.  The hospitals here are first rate.  Korean doctors and nurses are among the best trained professionals in the world, and they take excellent care of their patients.  In fact, they’re so good that many are moving to America and working in the medical field in order to ease the nurse shortage that exists in the United States.  If you ever have to give birth in Korea, you may miss out on the intimacy of the birthing process in the U.S., but you will probably not be dissatisfied with the care you receive when giving birth.

Shame, shame

What a shame it is to read that Floyd Landis tested positive for synthetic testosterone and has been fired by his cycling team.  The Tour de France disavowed his recent championship, although he must be stripped of his title by the International Cycling Union.  What a shame.  Shame on Landis for–apparently–cheating.  After two positive tests and being fired by his team, it definitely does appear that Landis cheated in the Alps to take home the yellow jersey.  The final verdict will come when the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency and the Court of Arbitration for Sport decide his fate.  For now, it’s not looking good for Mr. Landis.  I am disappointed to hear that he probably used artificial substances to win the Tour, not only because he is an American who will probably lose the Tour title, but also because his action has sullied the reputation of the Tour as well as the noble sport of cycling.
 
Sometimes cheaters do prosper, but occasionally their cheating gets the best of them, and they experience breathtaking falls from grace.  Landis’ situation reminds me of what happened to Dr. Hwang Woo-suk, formerly one of Korea’s top scientists, who was found last year to  have falsified the results of a cloning experiment used as the basis of an article published last year in Science Magazine.  Dr. Hwang was stripped of virtually every award he ever won and has retreated to the private sector.  Landis is hardly alone in the annals of athletes who have cheated to gain a performance edge.  From Tonya Harding (figure skating) and Jason Grimsley (baseball) to Ben Johnson (track and field) and Arnold Schwarzeneggar (bodybuilding), athletes in nearly every sport have used and abused substances to give them the advantage that will help them win.  Of course, cheating in sports is not limited to chemical substances–it can also include sabotaging your opponents, illicit gambling, or using technology to gain an unfair advantage.  Cheating isn’t limited to athletes–it can also include referees, managers, fans, owners, even members of sports governing organizations.  
 
Landis’ situation is especially disheartening because his performance affected the outcome of a major sporting event, the Tour de France.  Landis is hardly alone–two riders who were serious contenders to win the Tour this year, Ivan Basso and Jan Ullrich, were disqualified from the Tour over alleged substance abuse.  Other riders have likely used performance-enhancing substances but have not been caught.  Landis had the fortune–and misfortune–of being in the spotlight.  He is not the first to cheat and win or lose a major sporting event and get caught–that distinction could go to the 1919 Chicago Black Sox (baseball).  He won’t be the last.  But for now, the spotlight is on him.

Windows Live Spaces?

I logged into tonight to post a blog entry on Cyworld versus MySpace, but I immediately noticed that MSN Spaces suddenly became Windows Live Spaces (try saying that five times in quick succession).  I know MSN has been warning us for months, but I didn’t realize how dramatic a change it would be.  My initial reaction was, "Microsoft, why are you messing with a perfectly good site?"  I especially dislike the new, large MSNBC banner ad strewn across the top of the blog, taking up to much real estate. Blog content has apparently been relegated to a mere feature the blog page!  Microsoft owns the real estate for this site and allows us squatters to blog here free of charge, so we should be appreciative.  Then again, Blogger doesn’t dominate their bloggers’ sites (Blogger is Google‘s very popular blogging site and a competitor to the site formerly known as MSN Spaces).  I much prefer the old blog layout, where the blog reigns supreme. 
 
Dear Reader, what do you think of this format change?  Do you like the new face of Spaces?  I laud Microsoft’s effort to build web-based programs that work seamlessly with Windows and Office.  I’m looking forward to the day when I can write a Microsoft Word document using Office Live Word and save it on my online hard drive available for download anywhere.  Spaces is Microsoft’s initial attempt to transition MSN’s capabilities to the world of operating systems and productivity programs.  Microsoft knows it needs to do this to compete with companies such as Google and Yahoo!  Still, I liked the old MSN Spaces.  I was one of the first bloggers to join when it launched in December 2004.  The format had not changed since MSN Spaces was in beta release, and I grew used to it and liked it.  Maybe this new world of Windows Live Spaces will grow on me so much that I will like it better than MSN Spaces.  If not, there’s always Blogger.