FS Journal feature

I read on another blog that World Adventurers was featured in the January 2006 edition of the Foreign Service Journal, the monthly publication of the American Foreign Service Association.  The FSJ is widely read in the American diplomatic community, and I am honored by the Journal’s unsolicited acknowledgement of my blog in its monthly "Cybernotes" column.  My blog was purportedly highlighted along with a few other blogs related to Foreign Service life.  A hearty welcome to anyone who surfs over to World Adventurers from the FSJ.  Stop by anytime.  Some members of the Foreign Service community already read this blog.  One member calls World Adventurers "interesting and eclectic."  Another commented that it navigates overseas life and tackles sticky intercultural issues without succumbing to controversy.  I hope so.  This blog is ultimately my way of documenting life overseas with a modicum of entertainment value.  I do my best to avoid controversy and strive to inform.
 
I tried to obtain a copy of the magazine article, but I haven’t yet received my copy in the hinterland of Korea.  In fact, I just received the December 2005 edition, so I probably won’t get this month’s edition until sometime in February.  I checked the AFSA web site to see if I could view it online, but I haven’t set up my online account yet.  Drats!  I’ll see if I can get ahold of a copy soon.
 
Blog Notes:  I was very sad to find out this week that my grandma has been hospitalized and had to have major surgery.  Fortunately, the surgery was successful, and she is recuperating now.  What I wrote a recent blog entry about Nai Nai, my wife’s grandmother, is ever more relevant.  I’m praying that my grandma will pull through this so that I can see her again when we go home this summer.  She is my only living grandparent, and we are very close even though I haven’t spent much time with her in recent years.  I often think about her and wonder sometimes if I will see her again.  As they say, when it rains, it pours.  *sigh*

A Rant against East Coast Bias

I keep up with American sports primarily through the Internet, especially via ESPN.com.  After reading the prognosticators’ views of Sunday’s NFC Championship match-up between the Carolina Panthers and the Seattle Seahawks, I’ve developed faulty thinking that the Panthers are headed to the Superbowl.  I’ve read this ad nauseum online.  The Panthers are the pre-season NFC favorites.  Wide Receiver Steve Smith is unstoppable.  Panthers Quarterback Jake Delhomme is a gambler in the playoffs with the highest quarterback rating of any quarterback in the playoffs.  The Panthers won two games on the road against the New York Giants and the Chicago Bears.  The Panthers outclass the Seahawks in more head-to-head matchups, including offense, defense, and special teams.  Shaun Alexander, who?  Matt Hasselbeck, who?  If you read the armchair quarterbacks’ predictions, the Panthers might as well skip the game in Seattle and start practicing for the Superbowl in Detroit.  The same goes for the Denver Broncos and Pittsburgh Steelers.  According to the spin doctors, the Steelers are going to roll in Denver this weekend.
 
I have a different theory.  I believe the sports media is deliberately rooting for East Coast teams to go to the Superbowl.  ESPN.com, CNNSI, and their ilk don’t know what to do with themselves if teams other than East Coast or California teams make the playoffs.  A Denver-Seattle Superbowl is their worst nightmare.  I mean, Denver?  Seattle?  Who outside those cities even cares about those teams?  The fact is, the East Coast and California are where the largest audiences are.  If New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, or San Francisco are eliminated, then Carolina (Charlotte) and Pittsburgh will have to do.  The media hyped the Chicago Bears before Carolina beat them and the Indianapolis Colts before Pittsburgh eliminated them.  Then they hyped the Washington Redskins over Seattle.  Now they’ve switched to rooting for the teams closest to their target audiences.  Well, guess what?  Seattle and Denver are both very good teams.  Perhaps they will lose on Sunday.  As a true blue and green Seahawk fan, I have to say that I never have confidence the ‘Hawks will pull out a win.  But ESPN and other oversubscribed sports media should not be jumping on a bandwagon like fair weather fans.  Their "experts" get paid the big bucks to be knowledgeable and report fairly.  Anything less is tabloid journalism.
 
If you think I’m dreaming, let me give you a nice little sampling:
 
"I would rather eat fish eyes than see Seattle’s Seahawks in my beloved Super Bowl. The Sea-frauds have had the luckiest road to the Super Bowl this side of a fast food contest winner. I’m convinced they’re the destiny-driven product of the NFL’s easiest schedule and weakest division, the NFC West."
 
From ESPN.com:  http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs05/series?series=carsea
"Surging Smith Gives Carolina the Edge."
"Carolina WR Steve Smith should line up on the right side often this week, meaning Seattle CB Andre Dyson will have to play the game of his life for the Seahawks to advance, Jeremy Green writes."
 
Five out of six Sports Illustrated experts pick the Carolina Panthers to beat the Seahawks in Seattle, which has a perfect record this year at Qwest Field, including wins over the Colts and the Redskins.  The same experts pick the Pittsburgh Steelers to steal victory from the Denver Broncos.  Incidentally, both Denver and Seattle have identical 14-3 records.  The Panthers and the Steelers are 12-5.  Odds and higher win totals apparently no longer mean much to sports media.
 
I can deal with hearing about the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox in gory detail, because I expect nothing less of outlets based in Connecticut (ESPN) and New York (Sports Illustrated).  But there’s no reason for the sports media’s sudden conversion to Panthers and Steelers fandom.  I’d rather side with the Las Vegas odds-makers, a Western locale that picked Seattle as a 3.5 point favorite.  The odds are that if Seattle wins on Sunday, the sports media will pick the AFC champion, first Pittsburgh, then Denver, to win the Superbowl.  The further east, the more likely to be favored.  It’s completely bunk.  Which is completely fine if all this trash talk helps the Seahawks play better this weekend.

Navigating the undercareerents

Dear Reader, I’ll let you in on some of the impending career decisions I have to make in the next month that will significantly impact my career–and our future overseas.  I call these "undercareerents," or those ongoing career activities one has to do to keep their career afloat and livelihood intact.  I’ve alluded to these undercareerents in some of my past blog entries.  One is bidding on my next assignment.  Another is my quest to improve my German language skills.  The third is my career evaluation, which I must write and update each year.  All three of these ongoing undercareerents come due next month.  Between now and then, I will be very busy finishing all of them before I drown in the undertow.
 
Last fall I talked about bidding early for my next assignment.  If you recall, I submitted bids on ten jobs in China and was turned down for every single one of them.  Now my own bid cycle has come, and I must choose 20 jobs worldwide on which to bid.  I will be assigned to one of these jobs in 2007, after we leave Korea.  Everyone who will bid on assignments next month received the master bid list yesterday.  Over 350 jobs are listed for approximately the same number of bidders.  I reviewed the list and eliminated over half of the assignments on the list, including ones that start too soon or too late or require proficiency in a foreign language I do not speak.  I whittled the list down to 38 assignments in 24 countries that fit my schedule, my language ability, and my job preferences.  The list is only preliminary, and my wife and I have to research each assignment further to see if they meet our needs.  What surprised me most is how few attractive jobs are available in China.  I fully intended to bid on many China jobs, but after reviewing the bid list I found just two that really appeal to me, one in Hong Kong and the other in Shenyang.  I did not find a single job in Shanghai or Beijing that interested me, primarily because the work is far too similar to what I do now.  I really enjoy what I do for a living, but one of the joys of my line of work is the variety of opportunities available.  In my next assignment, I want to do something far different from what I do now.
 
Following is my preliminary list of assignment preferences.  This list is bound to change, but for now, this is my own wish list ranked by preference from 1 to 38:
 

Wellington New Zealand
Athens Greece
Hong Kong PRC
Berlin Germany
Damascus Syria
London UK
London UK
Montevideo Uruguay
Bogota Colombia
La Paz Bolivia
La Paz Bolivia
Belize City Belize
Asuncion Paraguay
Shenyang PRC
Buenos Aires Argentina
San Salvador El Salvador
Montevideo Uruguay
Bogota Colombia
Kuwait Kuwait
Panama Panama
Windhoek Namibia
Quito Ecuador
Sydney Australia
Shanghai PRC
Shanghai PRC
Hong Kong PRC
London UK
Managua Nicaragua
Tegucigalpa Honduras
Hamilton Bermuda
Santo Domingo DR
Santo Domingo DR
Havana Cuba
Mexico D.F. Mexico
Mexico D.F. Mexico
Beijing PRC
Guangzhou PRC
Guangzhou PRC

 

Cities listed in multiple indicate more than one job assignment.  Some of these, notably Wellington, New Zealand and Athens, Greece are assignments I have virtually no chance of filling because they are highly sought after and will receive dozens of bids.  Still, I won’t know unless I try.  I hedged my bets by adding less desirable assignments in places such as Bolivia and Paraguay with excellent job prospects.  The Berlin assignment is contingent on whether I can improve my German score.  If I fail my exam next month, I will have to drop it from my bid list.  Until yesterday, I would never have considered working in El Salvador or Namibia.  I was certain we would head to China in 2007.  Now, we could head anywhere in the world.  One aspect of bidding that works in my favor is that many of my peers are obligated to bid on assignments in hard-to-fill places where they speak the language, improving the odds the rest of us will get a position we want to fill.
 
At the same time, I must complete my six-page career evaluation detailing why I am a good employee.  Six pages doesn’t seem like much, but it can be very difficult to complete.  You have to condense your entire career into six pages and work with your supervisor and a senior reviewer to draft the best evaluation possible.  It is not enough to claim that you walk on water–you also have to feed 5,000 people AND walk on water.  The key to writing a good evaluation is to show that you are very successful in a succinct manner.  Tonight I probably should have been working on my evaluation, but I was so excited to consider the possibilities of my next assignment that instead I dissected the bid list.  I will dive into the evaluation tomorrow night.  Enjoy your Friday night!  I will spend mine writing my evaluation and taking a break to write another blog entry.