What’s up, Microsoft?

Dear Microsoft:
 
Why are you pushing back the release date of the consumer version of Windows Vista, the new Windows operating system?  Just yesterday you were going to ship in 2006, in time for the Christmas holidays.  It’s only been like…years…since you released Windows XP.  Did you take on more than you could handle?  I never thought a company with about 50,000 employees generating over $1 billion in cash each month could bite off more than it could chew, but apparently you did, Microsoft, when you overpromised on the release date to manufacturers. Your decision will impact hundreds of manufacturers and retailers who were counting on selling Vista as a Christmas goodie.  Who wants a late Christmas present delivered in January?  At least you’re still going to release the corporate version before the end of the year.  Is it really going to be worth the wait?  I’m perfectly happy using Windows XP, and I’m not sure I’m ready to pony up money to upgrade.  I’m not alone.
 
Well, there’s always Windows Live.  Maybe the next Windows version released in about 2015 will be completely online.

What about TiVo?

Reader Skobb77 asked me a few weeks ago for my thoughts on TiVo, the set-top box maker.  To tell you the truth, I have never used a TiVo, but I do know that owners use it to record programs and filter out commercials.  It is the best-known set-top box maker, but in fact it is a relatively small electronics company.  Fans of the technology swear by it, which is always a good thing for a company when it wants to build a strong customer base.  4.36 million people use TiVo.  It has a strong cult following.  While TiVo sounds like a really attractive concept–after all, who wouldn’t want to watch commercial-free television–there are still millions of people who don’t use TiVo, even though it’s been available for years.
 
TiVo’s stock rose recently as investors rewarded it for its new pricing structure, which TiVo hopes will attract new customers.  Analysts are rightly bearish about the company’s long-term future.  Many do not believe that TiVo can survive as an independent company and that it will either be acquired or fold.  TiVo reminds me of another former technology highflier whose best days may be behind–Palm.  Palm introduced the first personal digital assistant (PDA).  It became a huge hit, and the name "Palm" became synonymous with PDAs.  In business, no lucrative innovations are left uncopied.  Other manufacturers started to imitate Palm’s success in the late 1990’s.  Microsoft introduced the PocketPC, now the best-selling PDA operating system.  Dell’s Axim, a PocketPC PDA, is now the best-selling PDA.  Research In Motion’s Blackberry also became a huge hit, further dampening Palm sales.  Cell phone makers are a new threat as they design phones that can perform most, if not all, that a Palm can.  This left Palm in a very weak position, and its stock price tumbled.  Palm split into hardware and software companies, and the hardware company ended up merging with rival Handspring in order to survive.  To this day, Palm is a shadow of its former self, although it continues to hold its own in the PDA market.
 
Perhaps TiVo is an Apple Computer in waiting–a company whose with a promising past that is merely waiting for another huge breakthrough.  Perhaps TiVo will be rescued by a larger suitor, such as Google, which is rumored to be interested in TiVo.  More likely though, TiVo will continue to bump along, trying to find a suitor or a business plan that will make it successful.  Meanwhile, other technology, media, satellite, and cable companies have jumped into the set-top box fray, siphoning off sales from TiVo.  While TiVo is a pioneer, history is riddled with companies that pioneered a market and then faded into obscurity as their rivals overwhelmed them.  I think TiVo’s legacy is that eventually its name is now a generic noun–like the kleenex.  A kleenex is a facial tissue, but not all facial tissues are kleenex.
 
In other tech news, Google just launched Google Finance, a beta finance site.  I took a look tonight and was underwhelmed.  (Wade3016, did you read this?)  I still prefer to do finance research at Marketwatch, CNN Money, and Yahoo! Finance.
 
Blog Notes:  Tortmaster, no worries on the dinner.  No, the metaphor wasn’t about you.  I’ll get you back sometime.  The Atlas metaphor really has one message–take care of your best people, the ones who work hard for you.  You never know when you’ll need them, and if you don’t treat them well or diss them, they’ll walk and take their talents elsewhere. 
 
I’m sorry to see Team Korea lose this weekend to Team Japan 6-0 in the World Baseball Classic (WBC).  After beating Team Japan twice in competition, I think it’s unfair that the Koreans were eliminated in the third game.  I believe the WBC semifinals and finals should be a best-of-three competitions.  Baseball is trying too hard to mimick the World Cup.  Major League Baseball is tweaking the WBC format–I hope that league officials consider adding more games to the WBC schedule.  Japan won the WBC championship today 10-6 over Cuba.  This was a surprise to me–Cuba looked invincible until tonight’s game.  Japan might not have been in the championship at all if the WBC moved to a best-of-three format.  I am glad to hear that Seattle Mariner Ichiro Suzuki, my favorite player, was the game’s MVP.  The World Baseball Classic exceeded expectations.  It’s a shame it won’t be held again until 2009.

Seoul’s New City Hall

I drove by the Seoul City Hall this morning and found a large section of the city hall missing.  Gone in an instant, just like the temporary ice rink that was dismantled a couple weeks ago.  A section of the city hall, the northeast portion of the building, was completely gone, torn down virtually overnight.  I was surprised by the speed and stealth at which the city moved to dismantle it. 
 
Mayor Lee Myung-bak strikes again, I thought to myself.  Mayor Lee of Seoul is the one who spearheaded the greenification of the area in front of City Hall before the 2002 World Cup, a greenspace perhaps best known as the epicenter of a sea of "Red Devil" Korean soccer fans.  As mayor, Lee also spearheaded the effort to create a park at Namdaemun, or South Gate.  He led the effort to turn the elevated freeway above Cheongye Stream into an eco-park, a wildly successful project (now if he could just do something about the traffic…).  Mayor Lee has done a good job beautifying Seoul by supplanting concrete jungle with greenspace at key locations.  Although the projects have negatively affected some Seoul businesses and residents, most Koreans strongly support Lee’s efforts to improve the city’s image through beautification projects.  In fact, Mayor Lee’s efforts are so popular that he is now the favorite to be Korea’s next president (elections are in late 2007).
 
I wondered why the city had decided to dismantle a big section of the city hall, so I did some research and discovered that the City of Seoul is planning to build a new city hall tower next to its current city hall.  The current building, a C-shaped building built in 1926 and designated a historical landmark, is a rough granite remnant of the Japanese colonial occupation.  The new city hall will be a 22-story tower standing next to the remaining portion of the old city hall.  That explains the demolition of the northeast section of the building, I thought.  When the Bank of Korea built a new location across the street from its former home, it left the original Japanese colonial building intact as a historic landmark.  According to Korea University’s web site, the new city hall tower will be reminiscent of Bukhan-san, the mountain just north of downtown, and it will aestetically meld new and traditional architectural designs.  The firm charged with designing the new city hall building also designed other stylish buildings in Seoul, including Tower Palace and the Sang-am Landmark Building.